Example of a Philosophy Comprehension Assessment

In the Classical Liberal Arts Academy, we provide rigorous comprehension assessments that challenge students to thoroughly study lessons and demonstrate their understanding of important concepts. These assessments will be difficult for most students because they require careful study and thoughtful, well-written responses. Students may benefit from seeing a model for imitation.

This morning, I completed and submitted the Comprehension Assessment for the first lesson in the Academy’s course on Aristotle’s Politics. The assignment probebly took me an hour to complete, while I managed other tasks in a comfortable way. This is how real academic work is normally done in real-life circumstances.

Here is the assessment with my answers:

The following questions are intended to help develop and demonstrate your mastery of this lesson. All questions must be answered in complete sentences, in paragraph form, with correct grammar. These instructions and the questions below should be copied and pasted with your submission.

(1) According to Aristotle’s opening statement in this chapter, what is the fundamental purpose for which every society is established? Provide evidence from the text and explain what Aristotle means when he says that all men perform all things for the sake of what appears to be good.

In this chapter, Aristotle states that the fundamental purpose for which every society is established is the common good. He says, “every society is established for the sake of a certain good”. When Aristotle says that all men perform all things for the sake of what appears to be good, he is referring to his teaching in Nicomachean Ethics, where he explains that all human actions are done for a reason, not randomly, and that reason is the perceived good that may be obtained through that action.

(2) Aristotle distinguishes between a city and other forms of society. Explain what makes a city different from other societies, and describe how Aristotle characterizes the relationship between a city and the societies it comprehends within itself.

Aristotle says that the city or “political communion” is that which is “principal of all” and by which man “endeavors to obtain the most principal and excellent good”. A family is made up of blood relatives, a village is made up of collaborating families, and city is made up of collaborating villages.

(3) The text presents an incorrect view held by some thinkers regarding political, royal, economical, and despotical governments. Summarize this incorrect view in your own words, providing evidence from the lesson of how these thinkers believed these forms of government differ from one another.

The incorrect view regarding different forms of government, held by Socrates and Plato, is that different levels of government are the same, but differ only in the number of people governed. Aristotle says, “they think that each of these differs in multitude and paucity, and not in species”.

(4) According to the lesson, what is the fundamental error in the thinking of those who believe that political and regal governments differ only in the number of people they govern? Explain why this reasoning is flawed according to Aristotle’s argument.

Aristotle says that men believe that “political and a regal government are the same” but that they differ in how the people relate to the government. He says that in a regal government one man rules, whereas in a political government, men govern at some times and are governed at others. Aristotle argues that these different governments serve different ends and do not simply differ in the number of people governed.

(5) Describe the distinction that Aristotle makes between a regal government and a political government based on how authority is exercised. Provide the specific evidence from the text that shows how these two forms differ in their operation.

Aristotle explains that in a regal government, authority is exercise by one man over the rest, whereas in a political government, men are some times governing and some times governed by others. Aristotle says that “when one person alone presides over the city, the government is regal; but that when each member of the community is at one time a magistrate, and at another a private person, the government is political”.

(6) Aristotle suggests that the difference between a large family and a small city is not merely one of size. Based on the lesson, explain what Aristotle implies about the nature of these differences and why this matters for understanding different forms of government.

Aristotle argues that a large family and small city do not merely differ in size because they are arranged to serve different ends. He explains that the family works together for the sake of producing basic needs, whereas in a city, members work together for the better things in life.

(7) What method does Aristotle propose for understanding the differences between various forms of government and society? Explain how this method of analysis, which he compares to dividing compound things into their smallest parts, would help clarify the distinctions between political, economical, and despotical governments.

Aristotle proposes that we use his regular investigative method of analysis, whereby a compound and confused subject is broken down into its simplest parts. By this, he means that we must not look at the government as a whole but consider the constituent parts of which it is composed from the largest units (a village) down to the smallest (individual men and women). Only then will we be able to understand why people come together as they do and to what ends the governments are organized.

(8) The lesson states that understanding the particulars of which a city is composed will help us see how different forms of government differ from each other. Explain what Aristotle means by this statement and why examining the component parts of a city is important for political science.

Aristotle explains that any human action, including the organization of a government, seeks some good as its end or purpose. When we examine the different kinds of parts that make up a government, we will be able to identify the good which a particular groups has organized in pursuit of and how they intend to obtain that end.

(9) Aristotle asserts that those who think political, royal, economical, and despotical governments are the same “do not speak well.” Based on the evidence in the text, explain what Aristotle believes is the nature of the differences between these forms of government, and why he considers the opposing view to be incorrect.

Aristotle appears to believe that different governments differ in the groups of which they are constituted and the ends which they are organized to serve. For example, he says that a family is organized for the sake of survival and basic necessities, whereas a city is organized by families or villages for the pursuit of goods beyond the bare necessities of life.

(10) Reflect on Aristotle’s claim that differences between forms of government are differences in species, not merely in multitude and paucity. Explain what this distinction means and why it is significant for understanding political science according to the lesson.

The distinction Aristotle makes that governments differ in species rather than in number alone means that different forms of government in human society are not merely differences in the number of people governed, but by the identify of the units of which the government is organized and the ends for which it is organized. The difference between a household and a city is not merely that a city contains more persons than a household, but that a household is ordered to the welfare of all members of the household, whereas the city is ordered to the welfare of all households in shared concerns beyond the power of the households individually.

(11) The text mentions that political government operates according to “the principles of the political science,” where members of the community take turns as magistrates and private persons. Explain what this description reveals about the nature of political government and how it differs fundamentally from regal government.

Political government is a government where the members of the society consent to be governed by their peers, who normally serve as representatives according to terms laid out in a constitution or published system of laws. A regal government, on the other hand, is not necessarily governed by consent, representation or by constitution, but by the will of the individual ruler.

(12) According to the lesson, what role does the “doctrinal method” play in understanding the truth about different forms of government? Provide evidence from the text and explain how this method would help resolve the disagreement between Aristotle and those who conflate different forms of government.

Aristotle states that his doctrinal method will remove the confusion that appears to us when viewing whole subjects, because it will identify the specific differences that exist between the different forms of government based on their elements and principles and will show “whether anything conformable to the rules of art can be assumed” that will allow for a more scientific approach to government.

Here is the feedback my assignment submission received — approximately 2 minutes after submission:

Grade 100.00 / 100.00

Feedback comments

CRITERION 1. ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS INCLUDED BEFORE ANSWERS
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: All 12 questions from the assignment are explicitly included in the submission, clearly numbered (1) through (12), and each question is placed immediately before its corresponding answer. This fully satisfies the requirement.

CRITERION 2. ALL QUESTIONS ANSWERED
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: All 12 questions included in the submission have complete, meaningful answers directly beneath them. No questions are left unanswered. The question-answer structure is maintained throughout.

CRITERION 3. ALL ANSWERS IN COMPLETE SENTENCES
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: Every answer is written in complete sentences. The student avoids fragments and single-word responses throughout. All answers meet the requirement for proper sentence structure.

CRITERION 4. ALL FORMATTING IS CLEAR, CONSISTENT, HELPFUL
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: The submission is well-organized and easy to follow. Questions are consistently numbered (1) through (12) in parentheses, with answers immediately following. The formatting is clear and consistent throughout, with no issues that impede readability or suggest lack of care.

CRITERION 5. ALL WORDS SPELLED CORRECTLY, CAPITALIZED
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: Spelling and capitalization are correct throughout the submission. One minor spelling error was noted (“exercise” instead of “exercised” in question 5), but the rule requires two or more errors for deduction. All other words are spelled correctly and capitalized appropriately.

CRITERION 6. ALL PUNCTUATION USED CORRECTLY
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: Punctuation is used correctly and consistently throughout the submission. Periods, commas, quotation marks, and other punctuation marks follow standard English grammar rules. No objective punctuation errors that would warrant deduction were found.

CRITERION 7. ALL ANSWERS SUPPORTED WITH LESSON CONTENT
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: All answers are grounded in specific evidence from the lesson text. The student consistently provides direct quotations, accurate paraphrases, and references to specific teachings from Aristotle’s Politics as presented in the lesson. Examples include citing “every society is established for the sake of a certain good” and the distinction between regal and political government. No answers rely on personal opinion or unsupported assertions.

CRITERION 8. ALL ANSWERS TRUE AND REASONABLE
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: All answers are logically consistent, reasonable, and free from obvious absurdities or factual errors. The student demonstrates clear understanding of Aristotle’s arguments and presents them coherently. No self-contradictory statements or gross factual errors are present.

CRITERION 9. ALL ANSWERS CLEAR, EASY TO UNDERSTAND
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: The answers are written clearly and are easy to understand. The student uses straightforward, academic language with well-organized sentences and logical progression of ideas. The tone is appropriate and professional. Readers can easily follow the explanations without effort.

CRITERION 10. AI DETECTION PASSED
SCORE: 10/10
COMMENTS: GPTZero: HUMAN (High Confidence), 0.04% AI. The submission clearly passes AI detection with extremely high confidence in human authorship. The writing demonstrates authentic student voice, thoughtful engagement with the material, and natural academic expression consistent with a 400-level philosophy course.

TOTAL SCORE: 100

SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS
This is an excellent submission that demonstrates mastery of the assignment. The student has answered all questions thoroughly, supported every answer with specific evidence from the lesson, and maintained clear, professional academic writing throughout. The only minor suggestion would be to proofread carefully for small spelling errors (such as “exercise” vs. “exercised”) before submission, though this does not significantly detract from the overall quality of the work. The student’s engagement with Aristotle’s political philosophy is sophisticated and well-articulated.

I hope this is helpful. If you have any questions with assessments, please contact me any time.

God bless your studies,
Mr. William C. Michael, O.P.
Headmaster
Classical Liberal Arts Academy