In lesson 08 of Latin Grammar I, (on Irregular Adjectives) rule III says:
"Ocyor, ocyssimus; potior, potissimus; positivis carent, nisi sint ab okys Graeco et potis Latino. Novissimus et summus superlativum tantum habent, auctore Diomede, quibus adde IMUS.
Translation: Ocyor (more swift), ocyssimus (most swift) and potior (more able), potissimus (most able) lack positives, unless they are from okys (swift) in Greek and potis (able) in Latin. Novissimus (most new) and summus (highest) only have the superlative, acording to the author Diomede, to which add IMUS."
The last sentence is what I am confused about: "Novissimus (most new) and summus (highest) only have the superlative, according to the author Diomede, to which add IMUS."
I do not understand what the "to which add IMUS" means. Why would you add it to novissimus or summus, and if you did, what would it mean? I checked the previous lesson (on the formation of comparative and superlative adjectives) for something about IMUS but didn't see anything.
I was also wondering what "a" and "um" mean in rule IV. ("A nominibus substantivis juvenis et senex fiunt tantum comparativa junior et senior. Penitior et penitissimus a positivo penitus, a, um. Plautus writes, “Usque ex penitis faucibus.") The exposition doesn't give an English translation, and when I checked Whitaker's Words nothing came up.
If someone has been or is on this lesson and can help: your assistance would be much appreciated!
